CareerPath

Location:HOME > Workplace > content

Workplace

The Truth Behind Enlisting in 11C: Understanding the Differences and Challenges of Indirect Fire Infantryman

January 24, 2025Workplace4233
The Truth Behind Enlisting in 11C: Understanding the Differences and C

The Truth Behind Enlisting in 11C: Understanding the Differences and Challenges of Indirect Fire Infantryman

When individuals enlist in the U.S. Army, the Military Occupational Specialties (MOS) they are assigned can significantly impact their careers and experiences. This article delves into the differences between two specific MOS codes: 11B (Infantryman) and 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman), helping enlistees understand the possible initial disappointment they may experience and the value of each role.

Understanding MOS Codes 11B and 11C

11B refers to the

Infantryman

, which is a traditional combat role focused on ground combat operations. The primary responsibilities of an Infantryman include engaging enemy forces, patrolling, and providing security for other units. On the other hand, 11C, Indirect Fire Infantryman, specializes in operating mortar and other indirect fire weapons. This role involves positioning, firing, and monitoring indirect fire pieces to support other combat operations from a safer distance.

Initial Disappointment and Reality

Many enlistees who initially desire a role such as 11B (Infantryman) may feel upset when assigned to 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman). For example, some may feel that they are not being utilized to their fullest potential because of this assignment. However, it is crucial to understand that both roles are integral to the success of infantry operations.

Personal Experience:One enlistee, Dan, who joined with the hope of becoming an Infantryman (11B) in the 82nd Airborne Division, ended up in 11C due to random assignment at Fort Benning. While Dan was initially upset, he soon realized that the flexibility and unique responsibilities offered by 11C could be just as rewarding.

Roles and Training

Infantryman (11B):An Infantryman is directly involved in ground combat, engaging in close-quarters combat, and providing cover for other units. The training process for an Infantryman is rigorous and involves mastering a range of skills, from basic combat to advanced tactics. They are often the first to engage with the enemy.

Indirect Fire Infantryman (11C):An Indirect Fire Infantryman operates and maintains mortar and other indirect fire weapons. They are responsible for positioning these weapons and firing at enemy targets from a distance. The role involves less direct combat but is crucial in providing sustained fire support to friendly forces. Training for this role includes extensive field artillery operations and fire control systems.

Personal Insights and Experiences

Two specific individuals share their experiences:

Case Study 1: Dan’s Journey

During his training at Fort Benning in 2011, Dan was assigned to 11C. Initially, he was disappointed but soon realized that the role offered unique advantages. Specifically, 11C units have the Fire Direction Center (FDC), which is crucial for coordinating indirect fire support. Dan found that the esprit de corps in FDC was tighter, and the work was more team-oriented. He even had opportunities to engage in direct combat operations as an radiotelephone operator (RTO).

Case Study 2: Andrew’s Perspective

Andrew joined with the hope of being an Infantryman (11B) and was assigned to 11C. He felt that his role, while different, was just as rewarding. The ability to operate indirectly in support of combat operations and the close teamwork in FDC were a significant positive. Despite the challenges, he found that the role provided a sense of purpose and contribution.

Conclusion

While the initial disappointment of being assigned to 11C is understandable, both MOS codes offer unique opportunities and challenges. Infantryman (11B) and Indirect Fire Infantryman (11C) are both critical to the success of the infantry and play essential roles in combat operations. The experience of individuals like Dan and Andrew shows that both roles can offer fulfilling careers and personal growth.