Reflections on CGL 2019 Tier 3: Satisfaction and Analysis of Performance

Tier 3 of the Civil Services (Combined Graduate Level) Examination, or CGL, has been a bumpy ride for many aspirants. As someone who experienced the 2019 tier 3, I can attest to the roller coaster nature of the process. Initially, the essay and precis seemed straightforward, but a discussion with a fellow UPSC aspirant highlighted a significant oversight on my part. This essay delves into my experience, analyzing my score and satisfaction level after the 2019 CGL Tier 3.

Initial Impressions and Realization

Upon being faced with the topic “EIA” (Environmental Impact Assessment), my initial reaction was one of smugness. I felt the topic was simple, and the precis, being part of the essay, would not be a difficult task. However, once I arrived home and deepened my understanding of the topic with my friend, it became apparent that I had made a grave mistake. This realization left me feeling utterly shattered. Conversely, when I saw my name on the list of candidates who had passed Tier 3, my first thought was that I had managed to secure at least 25 marks. This provided a slight relief, but the anxiety over the possibility of falling short of the minimum marks continued to linger.

Score Assessment and Reflection

I scored 62 out of 100 marks in the CGL 19 Tier 3 exam. Initially, I had a benchmark for satisfaction set at an average of 50 marks based on predictions from educators. A score of 60, which was the average in the previous years (2017 and 2018), would have left me with neutral feelings. However, after watching various analyses on YouTube, I realized that the average score for CGL 2019 Tier 3 was closer to 58. This made me feel that I had achieved a decent score. It is important to note that some candidates scored surprisingly high, reaching 70, while others who had prior knowledge about EIA struggled and only scored around 40.

Comparative Analysis with Previous Years

Here is a comparative analysis of my performance across different years:

CGL 16: 65 CGL 17: 68 CGL 18: 77 CGL 19: 60

These scores suggest a slight decline in performance from 2018 to 2019. While I can easily predict that my satisfaction level with the 60 marks is lower than in previous years, it is important to view this in context. Despite the lower score, I am not only satisfied but also relieved as the pressure of the SSC exams is now lifted off my shoulders. Success in Tier 3 is one less hurdle to clear, and this state of mind is a significant relief.

Conclusion and Final Words

Reflecting on my experience, it is clear that while the 2019 CGL Tier 3 presented challenges, the overall satisfaction stems from the relief of having successfully passed. Aspirants in the ongoing process should remain optimistic and ensure they are well-prepared. With dedication and perseverance, overcoming these challenges can lead to meaningful achievements.

Remember: Continuous learning and understanding are key to excelling in these competitive examinations. Best of luck to all those who are striving for their goals through the CGL exam journey!