Millennials and Marriage: A Philosophical Perspective

As a millennial, I believe that marriage is outdated and in need of a serious overhaul. I either think it should be entirely abolished or transformed into an arranged marriage. There is no need to publicly justify your desire to have a sexual relationship with someone for the next 20 years. This is a personal decision between you and your spouse, and no one else cares. The only concern of your guests is whether or not you have alcohol at your wedding. Many of us couldn’t care less about your choices. I do not consider marital infidelity to be a bad thing, as it is a concept created by the Catholic Church. Why should you have to justify your actions under the guise of your imaginary divine being? Marriage is essentially about justifying having sex with other people in the name of religion, a game I refuse to play.

I have found a loophole: if I ever decide to get married, I would choose a common law marriage. Why support the De Beers Diamond Corporation and contribute to a business built on the murder and slave labor of millions of people, orchestrated by Cecil Rhodes in the late 1800s? The diamond and bridal industry may have deceived everyone, but they cannot deceive me.

Why Marriage is Outdated

Marriage, as we know it, is a socially constructed form of institution that has evolved over time. In a society where individuals increasingly prioritize personal freedom and autonomy, the traditional institution of marriage may not align with these values. As a millennial, I question the necessity of publicly declaring love and commitment through a marriage ceremony.

Public justification for a long-term sexual relationship is unnecessary and intrusive. Instead, couples should be allowed to maintain privacy and make decisions that benefit both parties without the constant scrutiny of others. The concept of marital infidelity is often rooted in outdated social norms and religious doctrines. By questioning these norms, we recognize that infidelity should not be stigmatized but rather understood as a natural part of human relationships.

Arranged Marriage as an Alternative

For those who still find the idea of arranged marriage appealing, it offers a different approach to forming relationships. In an arranged marriage, couples come together based on mutual respect and compatibility rather than romantic love. This form of marriage can be seen as a way to build a life partnership based on shared values and goals rather than societal expectations. While it may lack the romantic element often associated with traditional marriage, it can offer a more sustainable and long-lasting partnership.

Common Law Marriage

A common law marriage allows couples to establish a legal relationship without the need for a formal wedding ceremony. This form of marriage offers a flexible and modern approach to partnership, allowing individuals to make decisions based on their personal values and beliefs. As someone who values human rights and ethical consumption, a common law marriage aligns with my principles and promotes a more equitable and compassionate society.

Critique and Analysis

My perspective on marriage may shock some people, particularly those who find the institution sacred. However, it is important to remember that societal views are constantly evolving. What was once considered taboo or immoral is often reexamined and redefined. By questioning traditional beliefs, we can foster a more inclusive and accepting society.

Conclusion

Marriage, as we currently understand it, is an outdated institution that may not align with modern values of personal freedom and autonomy. I advocate for alternative forms of partnership, such as arranged marriages or common law marriages, which allow individuals to make their own choices without societal pressure. Whether we choose to get married or not, the key is to respect each other's decisions and promote a more compassionate and understanding world.

Keywords

marriage millennials arranged marriage

As an American company, Quora is required by law to adhere to the constitution set forth in 1787, including the First Amendment, which protects free speech. It is important to remember that telling the truth is a fundamental right, and it should not be suppressed or censored.