Is RSS Really as Bad as It is Made Out to Be in the Media?

Recent media narratives often paint the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as a negative force in Indian society, painting it as an organization that obstructs progress and hinders societal development. However, a closer look at the organization's contributions and the historical context reveals a more complex picture. The RSS has managed to gain a significant following, despite these negative portrayals, primarily because of its impact on educating Hindus about the true nature of secularism in India.

The Media's Depiction: A Leftist Narrative

The portrayal of RSS in the media is often biased, driven by a Leftist Congress/Marxist narrative that seeks to present it as an obstacle to progress. Reality, however, presents a different picture. The RSS, founded in 1925, is a charitable organization that works towards the well-being of Hindus. This is necessitated by the historical context where, for Hindu individuals, state was the organizing element. In contrast, for Muslims and Christians, religion was the primary organizing factor, leading to significant massacres during the waning colonial era, many of which were directly or indirectly provoked by the British.

Role in Hindu Survival and Education

The RSS has survived and thrived because it has played a critical role in educating Hindus about the true nature of secularism in India. Through its educational programs and social activities, the RSS has been able to impart knowledge and foster a sense of community resilience. Moreover, the organization is seen as the only organization capable of safeguarding the interests of Hindus, particularly given the changing nature of state relations with different religious communities post-independence.

Challenging the Narrative: Actions Speak Louder Than Words

From the perspective of the RSS, its actions are the ultimate testament to its value and purpose. Actions such as disaster relief, organizing free medical camps, and aiding in the infrastructure development process speak volumes about the organization's commitment to its members and the broader society. The RSS’s members, known as Swayamsevaks, are seen as selfless volunteers, conducting rescue operations, providing food and shelter in times of crisis, and even helping in government surveys and elections.

Critical Points of Controversy

Is RSS as Bad as People Say?

The question of whether RSS is as bad as it is made out to be depends on the context. While certain actions, like helping government surveys, might be criticized, these actions are seen as necessary for the organization’s survival and the well-being of its constituents. Additionally, the organization's activities during natural disasters, such as the cyclone Biparjoy or the Balasore train tragedy, are unequivocally positive and highlight its selfless nature.

Relief Work at Its Core

The RSS is known for its extensive relief work, particularly after natural disasters. From earthquake relief in Gujarat to cyclone relief in Orissa and West Bengal, the organization has consistently provided assistance, often surpassing the capabilities of other organizations. This continuous effort is a clear indication of the organization's focus on social welfare and selflessness, rather than communalism or detrimental activities.

Historical Context and Legitimacy

The RSS's presence in India predates many of the current political narratives. Its role in historical events, such as aiding in disaster relief during the 2001 earthquake or the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, demonstrates the organization's commitment to serving the community without regard for religion or community.

Public Perception and Donations

Moreover, the RSS's legitimacy is further validated by the fact that it has attracted significant donations, even from individuals of different faiths. A poignant example is a Muslim woman from Jammu and Kashmir, who donated Rs. 5 Lakhs of her savings intended for Hajj to the RSS, highlighting the organization's respect and trust within the community, regardless of religious differences.

Despite the controversy and media portrayal, the RSS continues to be viewed favorably for its consistent contributions to disaster relief, social welfare, and community building. Its members, or Swayamsevaks, are often seen as heroes, not just for their individual actions but for the broader impact they have on the society they serve.

Conclusion

The narrative surrounding the RSS in the media is often one-sided and fails to recognize the organization's substantial contributions. From disaster relief to community education, the RSS has established a legacy that speaks to its significance and impact on Indian society. Its members' actions and their selfless dedication to serving others serve as a powerful counter-narrative to the negative portrayal often seen in mainstream media.