FDR and the Accusations of Communism: A Historical Perspective

Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) is often remembered as a popular president who led the United States through the Great Depression and World War II. However, his presidency was not without controversy and accusations. One of the most persistent and damaging allegations made against FDR was that he was a communist. This article delves into the historical context and truth behind these accusations, exploring why FDR faced such labels and how they influenced public perception of his presidency.

The Accusations of Communism

During FDR's presidency, he was frequently labeled a communist, a label that was not only misleading but also malicious. The allegations stemmed from his implementation of New Deal policies, which aimed to address the economic devastation of the Great Depression. These policies included the establishment of social welfare programs, such as the Social Security Act, which sought to provide financial security to Americans in times of need.

Anti-Communist Stance and Strategic Decisions

Ironically, FDR was an ardent anti-communist. He was particularly wary of Stalin and his policies in the Soviet Union. During the Yalta Conference in 1945, FDR's secret plans involved plotting against Stalin, as he believed Stalin's actions were responsible for the murder of millions of innocent people in the USSR. FDR's anti-communist stance was evident in his realpolitik approach to international relations, including his strategic decision to support the Allies during World War II.

Contradictions in Political Allegations

It has become a consistent pattern in American politics for individuals who do not conform to the established norms or challenge the status quo to be accused of communistic leanings. Conversely, it is often Republicans who are accused of moving the country into economic recession or depression, which is frequently followed by accusations of fascism. This dichotomy highlights the political dynamics at play and the use of labels as a tool for political discourse.

A Historical Legacy of Political Prowess and Persecution

Throughout FDR's presidency, he faced not only accusations of communism but also other derogatory labels. For instance, he was called a “Jew,” a slur at the time, and accused of being a drunkard. Similarly, Eleanor Roosevelt, FDR's wife, was seen as a figure of disgrace due to rumors of her racial lineage. FDR's reputation as a leader who could grow into his role was also questioned, with many comparing him to less reputable predecessors such as Harry Truman and Lyndon B. Johnson.

Poverty and Accusations

Even in the face of the Great Depression, FDR's efforts to revitalize the economy were subject to criticism. Some accused him of being soft on communism, believing that his reforms would do more harm than good. However, it is important to recognize that the New Deal policies were among the most significant legislative achievements in American history, bringing the nation out of the economic abyss and setting a new standard for social welfare.

Perpetuating Misconceptions

The article "McBird" by Michael Kantor, which parodied LBJ and Lady Bird Johnson's alleged involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy, provides a humorous yet poignant view of the media's portrayal of political figures. Similarly, Trump's presidency remains a subject of much debate, with his critics often labeling him as illegitimate and lacking the necessary leadership qualities.

Conclusion

FDR's presidency was marked by significant challenges and controversies, including accusations of communism. While these accusations were often politically motivated and historically inaccurate, they highlight the complexities of American political discourse. FDR's legacy is a reminder of the importance of understanding the context and motives behind such labels, and the enduring impact they have on public perception and historical narrative.