Evaluating the Next U.S. President: Key Factors and Prospects

As the political climate heats up for the upcoming 2024 U.S. presidential election, the discourse surrounding potential candidates intensifies. With personal ideologies set aside, an objective analysis helps in identifying the best candidate. In this context, a Trump victory emerges as a more favorable outcome, particularly from a pragmatic perspective.

Objective Analysis of Presidential Candidates

The decision to evaluate presidential candidates based on an objective standpoint is crucial in ensuring a fair and impartial analysis. As someone not American, my perspective from an external viewpoint allows for a dispassionate assessment of the current political climate and the implications of a potential Trump victory.

Trump as a Personality Cult

Donald Trump has established a significant personality cult over his tenure as President. Following his first term, the fourth year under his leadership would likely mark his final term. This would provide an opportunity for U.S. politics to return to a more normal and stable status quo. The shift back to conventional political dynamics would be valuable in terms of restoring confidence in the democratic process.

Argument: A fourth year under Trump is unlikely to result in significant long-term political changes. The constitutional framework of the U.S. government is designed to prevent such drastic shifts. Claims suggesting an attempt to consolidate power during his second term are highly speculative and rooted more in conjecture rather than factual evidence. The bureaucratic complexity and checks and balances within the U.S. political system would make such efforts virtually impossible to execute successfully.

Divisive Issues and Electoral Integrity

The potential for divisiveness in a Trump victory is lower compared to a Kamala Harris win. The contentious nature of the 2020 election left many with justified doubts about the electoral process. A similar outcome in 2024 could intensify these doubts and lead to far-reaching consequences, such as legal challenges and widespread distrust. The impact on national unity and the integrity of the electoral process would be significant and potentially negative.

Argument: While a Trump victory would be highly divisive, it would likely be more manageable than the aftermath of a contested election. Kamala Harris's victory through a similar process of controversies and legal battles would be even more damaging to the fabric of U.S. democracy. The lingering doubts and conflicts could stoke long-term political tensions, making it difficult to rebuild trust and focus on pressing issues.

The Democratic Party’s House Needs Repairing

The Democratic Party has formidable challenges ahead, both in terms of internal and external opposition. Embracing defeat this election cycle and using the setback to realign and strengthen the party is a more strategic approach than winning a flawed presidency. The current leadership, represented by Joe Biden, has faced unprecedented challenges, and the emergence of Kamala Harris as a last-minute replacement further underscores these issues. The media's scrutiny of her speaking skills and policy coherence highlights areas that require improvement.

Argument: The shadowy leadership and the haphazard choosing of Kamala Harris as a political puppet indicate the need for a thorough overhaul of the Democratic Party's structure and traditions. Focusing on internal reform and rebuilding for the future is a more robust strategy than striving for an unsettling victory based on questionable means. Both the Democratic and Republican parties have the opportunity during the next presidency to reassess their platforms, leadership, and future candidates.

Conclusion: A Pragmatic Path Forward

In conclusion, a Trump victory in the 2024 election would provide a needed period of stability and a chance for both political parties to regroup and refocus. Conceding defeat now allows time for the Democratic Party to mend its divisions and prepare for the next election. The pragmatic approach of waiting for Trump's term to conclude would facilitate a return to more conventional and stable political conditions.

Recommendations: Accept the current reality, work towards internal reform, and utilize the time to rebuild the party for future success. This approach aligns with a more stable and constructive path for U.S. politics in the long term.