Adopting Orphans vs. Surrogacy: Navigating Genetic Desires and Societal Norms

When it comes to starting a family, the desire to pass on one's genetic legacy is deeply ingrained in human psychology. As per evolutionary psychology, two key drivers behind human actions are the preservation of the self and the transfer of one's genes through procreation. This conviction is so profound that it influences many aspects of personal life, from education and career choices to financial planning and aspirations.

Understanding the Core Instincts

Let's consider the reasons why individuals pursue education and accumulate wealth. The primary goal is often to secure a stable life and ensure that they have sufficient resources to provide a good life for their children. This, in turn, allows their children to have the means and opportunities to continue the genetic lineage. This deeply rooted desire is often seen as a natural imperative encoded in our DNA.

Conversely, the decision to adopt an orphan, though laudable in terms of societal service and mutual benefit, doesn't fulfill the same instinct. Adopted children, while providing the same joy and love as biological children, do not carry the genetic material of the adoptive parents. This can create a sense of disconnect with a core human need to pass on one's genes.

There are, of course, exceptions where individuals choose adoption despite the possibility of having biological children. However, these cases are more the exception than the rule, as societal pressures and personal preferences often prioritize biological parenthood.

Evolutionary Perspective and Societal Norms

It is important to acknowledge that the preference for biological children is neither inherently wrong nor socially acceptable; it is a deeply held belief in many societies. The instinct to continue one's genetic legacy is a powerful motivator, and many are driven to fulfill this desire through various means.

Consider the growing trend of surrogacy and even uterus transplantation. These technological advancements have catered to the desires of many individuals and couples who wish to have biological children. Surrogacy, in particular, has become a contentious issue, with some viewing it as an ethical extension of reproductive autonomy while others see it as a form of commodification of human life.

In India, the challenge is not only genetic inheritance but also the societal stigma associating with barrenness, especially for women. This societal pressure can be a significant driving force for many to undergo IVF or use surrogacy to have a biological child.

Personal Consideration and Adoption

My own perspective, as a commentator, is rooted in anti-natalism, advocating for the minimization or non-existence of new births. However, for those who do wish to have biological children, I strongly recommend considering surrogacy. While the process is not without its challenges, it is a modern solution that offers more control and personal connection compared to traditional surrogacy methods.

For those who are unable or choose not to go through the complexities of IVF or surrogacy, adoption remains a noble and fulfilling choice. Adopting an orphan or a child in need can be an incredibly rewarding experience. Despite the potential challenges, it offers an opportunity to give a child a family and a future, and can provide the adoptive parents with a sense of fulfillment that comes from parenthood.

To summarize, while the desire to pass on one's genetic legacy is a significant factor in reproductive decisions, there are alternatives such as adoption that offer equal if not greater benefits to society and individuals. Whether through surrogacy or adoption, the choice should be informed by personal values, societal norms, and the well-being of all parties involved.